
…and how to turn this situation around.
The first time I ever set foot on a movie set was back in 2001 (working as a boom operator on a Sarah Polley short film). Since that day my passion for making movies has only grown and intensified. But one underlining question that continues to run through my mind is…why do most (95% or more) Canadian films tank at the box office.
Ask any Canadian filmmaker this question and you’re sure to start up a very long and never-ending conversation that might leave you wonder what made you want to open that can of worms. Well, I’m going to open the can of worms…just for this article. I’m so proud to be Canadian and our industry produces world-class movies year after year, however, these films just don’t seem to make any money (profit).
I found a great article by Canadian actor, writer and producer, James O’Regan that explores this matter in further detail:
Over the last year or so, a great teeth-gnashing has broken out within the Canadian Movie industry. Producers and their public sector confreres at Telefilm Canada sat down to wonder why no-one saw Canadian movies in the theatres. And now Telefilm has unveiled new money to throw at the problem.
In case you don’t know, Telefilm Canada is an arms length crown agency that has no public accountability via a “value for money” audit unless its own board of directors thinks it needs one – wow, get me on that gravy train, quick! It has generated, over the last 30 years, an industry wholly ignorant of Canadian theatrical film markets and wholly dependent on cultural welfare in the mistaken belief that you just can’t make any dough here a mare usque… I and every American film distribution company on the planet know different. I know because I’ve made money in the Canadian box office, in fact more money on one film than all Telefilm films on average. My short comedy, Edsville – about an innocent young couple that stumbles upon a town of Ed Sullivan impersonators – has a recoupment rate of 20% while the average recoupment rate published in Telefilm’s annual report, year after year, hovers at 2%-ish. I’ve also observed what our Yankee cousins actually do. All you have to do is ask them and they’ll actually tell you – hey, who knew?
So let’s see what it takes to make money and sell movies in Canadian moviedom. Here’s the top 12 for anyone who wants to make $8M on a movie in three weeks in Canada:
Rule # 1: No one knows what sells
Rule # 2: See Rule # 1, no, seriously, memorize Rule #1. I’m not saying this only to make the list apostolic, really. I could make something else up.
Rule # 3: Anything that helps sell is good
Rule # 4: The public will pay to see things or people they really like
Rule #5: Exploit people or things that the public likes
Rule #6: The Canadian Public doesn’t care who directs, writes or produces movies
Rule #7: The Canadian Public pays to see “people” on the screen. Actors are the Product
Rule # 8: The Canadian Public loves Stars
Rule # 9: Make sure you have a story
Rule #10: Comedy Sells (Canadians are masters of comedy)
Rule #11: Do everything you can to ensure the Canadian Public knows about the movie
Rule #12: To the risk taker goes the reward. All else is bunk.
To manufacture and market a Canadian movie to the Canadian market, you have to invest $3.5M. Making the movie costs CDN $2.5M. Marketing the movie for a 100 screen three week release costs CDN $1M.
Let’s take a look at how much money you can make. A 100-screen release can generate up to $16M in revenue. If you control the marketing with your $1M, you get $8M back from your $3.5M investment. Isn’t math for fun and profit great?
If you don’t spend that $1M, you are guaranteed to make nothing at the Canadian box office. Telefilm Canada and its producers don’t spend the money and the results are predictable. Movies funded by Telefilm Canada don’t earn a profit from Canadian box office; they don’t even recoup. Telefilm Canada data shows that Canadian distributors have an average marketing budget per Canadian film of $30,000 – about $970K short of what they need; that this average results from a blend of a majority of films released with an actual budget of less than $10,000. Hoo boy, why aren’t these films making the big bucks, eh?
Let’s say it again for the benefit of Telefilm and its Canadian producers, you must spend $1M regardless of a movie’s budget to have a chance at success.
Had the recent Egoyan opus, The Sweet Hereafter, received $1M in Canadian marketing highlighting the divine Sarah Polley, it might have made some bucks. After all, Polley has a following in Canada – more of a following than Egoyan. Yet it was Egoyan that the producers tried to market, not Polley. The little money that was spent was spent foolishly – see rule #6.
Even a American B movie like Nurse Betty gets the full $1M marketing treatment. Learn the lesson from American distributors who know better; who do spend $1M for each film they release in Canada.
Here’s the best part about making sacks of cash in Canada. Manufacturing, distribution and marketing infrastructure are all 100% in place. All you have to do is come up with a movie to market and some cash to market it with. Hey, pinch me!
Why isn’t it working now? Why is Telefilm’s record so dismal? Public policy has intervened in the movie business only at the level of manufacturing – dolling out wallops of cash to make movies. The new funds maintain that approach. This is simply bad policy and we have bank vaults full of unseen films to prove it.
The only successful public policy intervention on the books are Canadian Content (CanCon) rules for the Canadian music industry. There, public policy told the radio stations (the exhibitors) that they had to play a percentage of Canadian music or else they would be shut down. Today, we have a thriving music industry with big Canadian stars.
Before CanCon in the music industry, Canadian Radio stations played about 3% of Canadian content. After CanCon, it became 30%. Can-con drove the business of the Canadian music industry. It supported the early market-driven development of Canadian music stars. It allowed financial and artistic success in the small Canadian market. Remember there was no success before Can-con rules for the music industry. That Canadian-based market success worked as a springboard to world success for many Canadian performers. It took a while to work but work it did.
Marketing is simple. It just costs money. With its new infusion of funds, it appears that Telefilm will try to mystify the process per usual, read the entrails and divvy up the dough without recognizing rule # 1 – no one knows what sells. That is the mystery and joy of movie selling – ya just don’t know and no-one can give you the magic bullet, i.e. previous box office records, e.g. think how many major studios have hit rock bottom with a series of losers only to bounce back “unexpectedly.”
If public policy is going to intervene, it should get out of movie production and into the marketplace with CanCon for Canadian cinemas. Set a quota, step out of the way and voilà: in five years, we will have a thriving movie business with big Canadian stars. Movie producers are much better at making movies than cultural bureaucrats. I know, call me crazy, but it’s true.
CanCon rules for the Canadian movie business are one means of helping create movies and movie stars without spending a lot of tax dollars. That’s all they do. Canadian mov
ies don’t need it to succeed but if government is to intervene to help reward risk, then that’s the best way and means of intervention, and cheaper too.
For public policy, how bad could it be to issue an “initiative” to exhibitors across the country, insisting that 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% of product viewed in Canadian cinemas must be indigenous Canadian product over a period of years. Then stand aside and let the industry do what it does best: sell movies.
Hey, it ain’t that hard. After all, no one, not even Hollywood, knows what sells. Remember rule #1?
How to turn this situation around?
Now, it’s time for me to add in my two cents worth. We (the Canadian film industry) need more film studios here in Canada. I’m not talking about some glorified soundstage like Filmport but a full-fledged independent movie studio that has 100% control of the financing, development, production and worldwide distribution of their movies. These Canadian movie studios should have only two objectives:
1) To make movies that will entertain millions of people around the world. Focus on giving moviegoers what they want and according to the current all-time North American box office stats…people want to see movies with Action, Animation and Special effects. Success leaves clues.
2) To maximize profits.
That’s it. When that day happens, then we’ll definitely see a lot more Canadian films reaching the #1 spot at the box office. Both domestically and overseas.
Ian Agard
Filmmaker & Author of “Stop Waiting and Make Your Movie”
http://www.ianagard.com
P.S. Get info about my new ebook at:
http://www.ianagard.com/how-to-finance-your-movie
Watch the video related to Box office
LISTEN TO FULL AUDIO: tinyurl.com TIME recently went to interview Neil deGrasse Tyson and we noticed a huge crate had been delivered to his office. He was then kind enough to open it on-camera. The back story of this gift is that Neil was adamant that ABC News include the Saturn V Rocket on its list of The 7 Wonders of America. The folks at the Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama were so grateful, they sent Neil a replica.
Help answer the question about Box office
Why was the movie Great Balls Of Fire a failure at the box office?
I LOVED the book and the movie and I really do not understand why it wasn't fantastic at the box office. Perhaps YOU can help me out there please.
About Author
Ian Agard is film producer,screenwriter and director living in Toronto. Go to http://www.ianagard.com where Ian reveals more useful tips to boost your filmmaking career.
I always find myself speechless every time I see your work. I always rate it 5 stars. You’re quite talented. Keep up the beautiful job. ^_^V
NUMBER 1 THIS WEEKEND!!! 70.6 million is what I heard. I think it's the biggest film, money wise this year since Dark Knight. Although I could be wrong.
Hm…that you did, that you did.
b4 hand
what if it really was a real photo? and he just reversed the effects? like instead of creating it, he de-creates it, and plays it backwards? lol
Is it really that hard to beleive someone has tallent?
No, it's safe to say it flopped. The movie opened with less than half the money the other spoof movies made.
Hopefully this will ring the death knell for these annoying spoofs.
grease 2… they ruined it.
I think it's going to do very well, probably almost as good as LOTR/Harry/Narnia. With so many obsessed fans, the movie would have to be completely awful to not do well.
awesome work I wish i could draw like you but i already chose Anime as my drawing method im not good with realistic.
Only US box office figures are counted as domestic in the US. Canadian box figure numbers are released on their own, however the Canadian media tends to print North American numbers which are the combined US and Canada (sorry, Mexico), since they are larger.
The number one movie last week in Canada was "The Day the Earth Stood Still" which grossed $1.81 Million. If you want to see the rest of the list, it's at
http://www.tribute.ca/movies/boxoffice.asp
Sigh…same here.
beautiful! May I ask what screen capture program you used? It’s so smooth and you don’t ever zoom in or navigate around? I just really like how the video doesn’t jump all over the place like some speedpaint videos do.
The Box Office means money – how much the movie has made selling tickets in US movie theaters. Foreign, PPV, DVD rentals and sales are technically not part of a film's box office, though they do contibute to a film's profits.
The profits of the movie typically go to the producers, or the production company, who hired the director. Some directors, like Spielberg, have their own production companies, like "Dreamworks" and "Amblin' " Some actors have their own production companies, too, like Clint Eastwood (OK, he started out as an actor) whose company is Malpaso Films or John Wayne (?) who had Batjac Productions.
lol then i have no complaint the art is awsome
Many beginning actors work box office because they want to be working "in" the theatre and that is all they can get. However volunteering is another story. As a box office volunteer ( or even employee) you will not be near or on the stage. But depending on the size of the theatre and the company, you possibly will have interactions with the people that are. However this is far from a guarantee. Some theatre box offices are pretty far away from the backstage area, the stage and the green room and in most larger theatres you may never even have contact with the director or anyone else directly involved with the production. You will however get to know the house manager and you never know what connections they may have.
If this is a smaller theatre then this may be a good opportunity to make connections and get your face recognized as well as showing your dedication to the company. If this is a large theatre you most likely will be wasting your time.
Titanic's total: 1.8 billion dollars
Dark Knight: Little over 1 billion.
No, not at all. I said “what if” =D